Forced labour for Jobseekers

Article published: Monday, March 8th 2010

Despite high levels of unemployment due to the recession jobseekers in Greater Manchester will be forced to work up to 40 hours a week as part of the Work for Your Benefits (WfYB) pilot scheme. The region is set to be the trialling ground for a government initiative that will see unemployed people put into mandatory work placements for up to six months just to hold on to their Jobseeker’s Allowance.

Below minimum wage

From October Jobseekers who have failed to find a job at the end of the Flexible New Deal programme will be required to undertake full time employment for between £50 and £65 a week, the equivalent of as little as £1.27 an hour. Concerns have already been raised that, with the numbers of unemployed rising, people who genuinely cannot find a job will be forced to work for next to nothing in an unsuitable role.

Alex Halligan from Salford Unemployed Workers’ Union said, “It’s disgusting that they’ve chosen to trial this in an area with such high unemployment. This scheme is a further attack on the right of people who can’t find work to get the support they need.” Those who opposed the scheme say that it fails to take into account personal circumstances or the condition of the economy.

WfYB is being introduced as part of the government’s wide-ranging reform of the welfare system. Other elements include lowering the age up to which parents can claim child support and measures to force more people off incapacity benefits.

Workers wages could fall by 12 per cent

Some suggest that the scheme will affect the working population as well as those claiming benefits. “This flood of unwaged labour into the market will have a big effect on low waged jobs. When a similar scheme was introduced in the US there was a 12 per cent decline in pay for low-income jobs,” Rebecca Galbraith from ‘No to Welfare Abolition’ told MULE.

Commenting on the fact that private companies rather than Jobcentres will be running the WfYB programme, she added, “Whoever runs this scheme it will be a disaster, but private companies can set arbitrary targets and are much less accountable.”

Businesses will be paid for each person they get into a work placement. This has raised fears companies might ignore difficult cases or put people into unsuitable positions just to receive the commission.

Labour MP John McDonnell placed a parliamentary question in December regarding the employment rights that participants in the scheme will be entitled to. He is concerned that, since they will not be technically employed, those taking part may be put in danger as they may not be covered by health and safety legislation.

Charities set to lose out

Charities and social institutions that rely on volunteers, many of whom are also Jobseekers, have expressed concerns that WfYB will take these people out of important roles and put them into positions that have no benefit to the community.

“The government does not care that many ‘claimants’ are not actually idle and do a lot of unpaid work like caring for others. Real voluntary activities will suffer if people are kicked into work schemes under this pilot,” said Mike from No to Welfare Abolition.

Alongside the WfYB scheme an alternative Jobcentre Plus regime will be trialled, designed to offer Jobseekers increased adviser contact and access to a personal support fund. This trial will receive just £3.5 million of funding whereas the WfYB programme will receive £15 million, raising questions over the government’s priorities.


Tenders for the running of the scheme have been submitted and will be allocated in April. It remains to be seen which employers will be taking advantage of the cheap labour, or the kinds of jobs people will be expected to do.

Patrick Smith

More: Manchester, News


  1. The cost of Gtr Manchester’s city region status grows daily.

    What wont our mis-representers do to feed their ego’s?

    Selling it’s citizens down the swanny for what? to gain a little ‘autonomy’ from Whitehall?

    Devolved power, more like devolving politics.

    Comment by Concerned Netizen on March 8, 2010 at 1:23 pm
  2. […] Forced Labour for Jobseekers Pilot. Filed under: Campaigns for Unemployed, Welfare State, Workfare, jobseekers allowance — Tags: Unemployment, Workfare — Andrew Coates @ 4:01 pm Forced labour for Jobseekers (Via Manchester Mule here) […]

    Pingback by Forced Labour for Jobseekers Pilot. « Ipswich Unemployed Action. on March 8, 2010 at 5:01 pm
  3. […] a reality Despite high levels of unemployment due to the recession jobseekers in Greater Manchester will be forced to work up to 40 hours a week as part of the Work for Your Benefits (WfYB) pilot scheme. The region is set to be the trialling […]

    Pingback by Manchester Jobseekers: 40 hours week workfare for 6 months | Flexible New Deal Provider Information & Flexible New Deal Scandal on March 8, 2010 at 6:52 pm
  4. […] more coverage of the trial, see Patrick Smith’s article on how Jobseekers may be forced to work for as little as £1.27 per hour just to claim their […]

    Pingback by Welfare Reform: who will it affect?  —   MULE on March 10, 2010 at 11:19 am
  5. […] See here and here for the related coverage in MULE. […]

    Pingback by We’re Closing Down « Other Than on March 31, 2010 at 5:55 pm
  6. […] parents, unemployed workers, carers, and low-waged workers read MULE’s previous articles here and […]

    Pingback by Incapacity benefit claimants under scrutiny in ‘fitness to work’ trial  —   MULE on May 15, 2010 at 1:30 am
  7. […] Furthermore many aspects of the New Deal programme introduced by Labour and aimed at people unemployed for more than 6 months are patronising: they force you on to unhelpful courses which do nothing to build skills or experience, attended by many simple to receive JSA; or even worse other schemes including compulsory full-time work placements during which the person can be paid less than £2 an hour. Aside from being viewed as cheap labour and rarely kept on for proper employment, this can have the knock-on effect of lowering other workers’ wages – evidenced by a similar scheme that ran in America. […]

    Pingback by The £52-a-week lifestyle choice  —   MULE on September 16, 2010 at 9:51 am
  8. One question – I am unable to work so how can they force me to work and what would be the consequences?

    Comment by Henryk Baranski on October 17, 2010 at 4:09 pm
  9. One question – I unable to work so how can they force me to work and what would be the consequences?

    Comment by Henryk Baranski on October 17, 2010 at 4:11 pm

The comments are closed.